|
|
Post by yoell on Dec 2, 2008 12:38:12 GMT -5
Another wheeler and I were talking not too long ago. This question came up; are wheelers better kissers than those AB dudes. It was posed with the thought that as a consequence of our
situation that we get far more out of kissing. As a wheeler, depending on each of everyone's physical abilities, we get quite a bit of kissing. I really don't know one way or the other, but I thought it was interesting question. If I had had to guess, I would say that we are better in that we put more effort and thought in to kissing, as apposed to ab's. Just posting an interesting question......talk amongst yourselves.
|
|
southernman
Junior Member
Posts: 76
Gender: Male
Dev Status: Disabled
Relationship Status: Single
|
Post by southernman on Dec 2, 2008 13:22:43 GMT -5
Another wheeler and I were talking not too long ago. This question came up; are wheelers better kissers than those AB dudes. It was posed with the thought that as a consequence of our situation that we get far more out of kissing. As a wheeler, depending on each of everyone's physical abilities, we get quite a bit of kissing. I really don't know one way or the other, but I thought it was interesting question. If I had had to guess, I would say that we are better in that we put more effort and thought in to kissing, as apposed to ab's. Just posting an interesting question......talk amongst yourselves. That might be true, and if so then would you think that a wheeler might be better at doing other things such as say foreplay for all of the same reasons you just stated? |
|
|
|
Post by Claire on Dec 2, 2008 14:21:48 GMT -5
I'm afraid I can't comment on that but I'm looking forward to the responses.  |
|
Phil
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by Phil on Dec 2, 2008 14:44:28 GMT -5
From what I'm reading between the lines in the OP, because the disability prevents or limits X, you're supposed to be better at Y? Nah, I don't buy it. And I believe I've kissed enough crip women to formulate an opinion.  You're either good at something, or you're not. (Fill in your own blanks with that last thought. ) Being a good lover, kisser, whatever requires a desire on your part to be the best you can be. That desire to please is either something you have or you don't. So, no, I don't buy it. I don't think the disability "makes you" anything you don't want to be or become someone that you aren't. |
|
|
|
Post by Pony on Dec 2, 2008 15:59:03 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm pretty much with Phil on this!! You don't suddenly become more passionate, affectionate, sexual because you end up in a chair. However, I, personally, have learned to direct the focus of my pleasure towards things I CAN do, and completely away from things I CAN'T do anymore. So, in that sense, I direct my energies towards touching, licking, kissin and mental-sexual play rather than doin it doggie-style. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Dec 2, 2008 17:01:13 GMT -5
I don't think disability would make anyone necessarily 'better kissers'. However with alternative circumstances when it comes to that type of passion, it can result in someone putting more effort into the other aspects of romance, due to compensation made by the person.
|
|
|
|
Post by BA on Dec 2, 2008 18:23:33 GMT -5
From what I'm reading between the lines in the OP, because the disability prevents or limits X, you're supposed to be better at Y? Nah, I don't buy it. And I believe I've kissed enough crip women to formulate an opinion. You're either good at something, or you're not. (Fill in your own blanks with that last thought. ) Being a good lover, kisser, whatever requires a desire on your part to be the best you can be. That desire to please is either something you have or you don't. So, no, I don't buy it. I don't think the disability "makes you" anything you don't want to be or become someone that you aren't. Totally agree with Phil here. |
|
|
|
Post by faith on Dec 2, 2008 18:53:02 GMT -5
No doubt we need a formal study and research project to come to the correct conclusion on this subject.
Any volunteers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Claire on Dec 2, 2008 20:21:16 GMT -5
Yeah Phil makes total sense. And Faith has an excellent idea, maybe some of you single ladies can make this huge sacrifice in the name of science.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Dec 2, 2008 23:14:49 GMT -5
Alright! Alright! I'm not one to be a guinea pig, but if it's for the greater good of mankind, I'll make the sacrifice!  |
|
Phil
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by Phil on Dec 3, 2008 12:25:24 GMT -5
Alright! Alright! I'm not one to be a guinea pig, but if it's for the greater good of mankind, I'll make the sacrifice! hahahahaha Diving on your sword for the sake of humanity! |
|
|
|
Post by E on Dec 3, 2008 14:36:36 GMT -5
Alright! Alright! I'm not one to be a guinea pig, but if it's for the greater good of mankind, I'll make the sacrifice! hahahahaha Diving on your sword for the sake of humanity! Actually, I believe he's trying to get someone else to dive on his sword. |
|
Phil
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by Phil on Dec 3, 2008 17:27:50 GMT -5
hahahahaha Diving on your sword for the sake of humanity! Actually, I believe he's trying to get someone else to dive on his sword. I have a great comeback for that, but I'd better not say anything. |
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Dec 3, 2008 21:38:02 GMT -5
lol, I've already got my personal 'sword-diver', no previous circus experience, either!
I doubt I'm qualified to be a competent candidate for the study anyway, but I guess other's would be the judge of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by yoell on Dec 4, 2008 0:14:08 GMT -5
Well, since I started this topic. I will be more than happy to be test subject. I just need a dev near Colorado.
|
|
