|
Post by Ouch on Dec 8, 2008 9:11:57 GMT -5
The iGasm!?! So Apple is moving in on the sex toy market!?! Steve Jobs draws no limits!!!
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Dec 8, 2008 10:24:32 GMT -5
interesting...it was like having an orgasm-for a woman, maybe not a man-was just part of a 'health regimen'. maybe it wasnt even associated w/sexuality at all. probably wasnt...
|
|
|
Post by Pony on Dec 8, 2008 13:10:54 GMT -5
Damn, I'm sorry lil Annie for hijacking your thread. One thing just leads to another, and before it's over we're discussing iGasms. lol Actually, that's GREAT....I didn't know Apple had a patent on the female orgasm. Man, what an innovative company!! Triman, yeah, guess for a long time they just thought women needed to relieve the 'hysteria' inside with 'paroxysm', which is a violent release of emotion. So they didn't even call it orgasm? 'Honey, i have appointment this morning to get a paroxysm. It shouldn't take too long since the Doc got this new water-jet tool.' lol You know, I remember seeing ads as a kid in mags for those 'neck' vibrators. I was too young to figure out the neck wasn't what they used it for. I think I have an idea for a new business... Your first Paroxysm is FREE!
|
|
|
Post by Inigo Montoya on Dec 8, 2008 14:04:57 GMT -5
Um, just so you know... Ann Summers out of Britain is the one with the iGasm... not Apple. I think Steve Jobs is pissed because when I first googled it all that popped up was stuff about the lawsuit. Oh, and how rude of me... Welcome, Annie!
|
|
|
Post by Pony on Dec 8, 2008 16:39:19 GMT -5
Damn Clover, you are absolutely correct!! I had no idea that this is a real invention that someone, Ann Summers, came up with. This is brilliant, the vibrator works to the pulse of the song on the iPod. I'm always soooo close to 'genius' but never quite there. When the iPhone came out, I thought it should also include 'vibrate mode' which stayed on, but this actually connects to your iPod...I'm thinking probably best results by listening to Polka music.
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Dec 8, 2008 20:22:59 GMT -5
i luv these slightly chunko but firm-ish brit chix. especially the blond. damn. see girls...skinny is OVERRATED.
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Dec 8, 2008 21:43:50 GMT -5
...yeah, I was joking with the whole Apple reference...
*Woe it is to have been in the I.T. field. Hangs head.*
|
|
annie
Full Member
Posts: 197
|
Post by annie on Dec 8, 2008 23:10:46 GMT -5
oh my, my, what an invention. I am gonna have to say hammer time would be the perfect track for this contraption haha
|
|
|
Post by Pony on Dec 9, 2008 15:34:00 GMT -5
And the HammerTime lyrics work, too - "Can't Touch This!" lol
|
|
annie
Full Member
Posts: 197
|
Post by annie on Mar 2, 2009 21:14:38 GMT -5
I haven't posted in a while, I have been a busy bee. I decided to see if redheads have more fun!
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Mar 3, 2009 14:30:18 GMT -5
hey annie, you've got glasses JUST LIKE TONY'S... nice pic.
|
|
|
Post by Pony on Mar 3, 2009 17:13:13 GMT -5
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROWWWWWWWWWLLLLLLLL....I've never kissed a girl with glasses while I had mine on. My question is: do your glasses end up hitting each other??? And does it magnify the eyeball up close???
|
|
annie
Full Member
Posts: 197
|
Post by annie on Mar 3, 2009 17:25:58 GMT -5
Haha. Actually it is hard to have a dual bespectacled make out session. They end up getting in the way and smacking each other. I end up taking them off when things go down, it's not like when you are smooching you need 20/20
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Mar 4, 2009 7:19:33 GMT -5
...while I don't have eyeglasses myself (I swear I feel like I'm the only non-blind person in the world sometimes...), I can say from first-hand experiences glasses do zoom the eyes up bigger, quite nicely, in my opinion. Some folks probably don't want to have 20/20 when they're smooching (just ask noi1588 )
|
|
|
Post by Claire on Mar 4, 2009 8:08:38 GMT -5
Wind, you are so hard on yourself!!! Noi, please beat that out of him for me.
|
|