|
|
Post by BA on Jun 28, 2007 20:18:34 GMT -5
I have actually never looked at them until you put up this post. Yuck. The photoshop quality is awful, but even if it were good, I have to say it does nothing for me whatsoever. I like real people.
Gimp Porn: 4 on the scale. Doesn't entice my sensibilities.
Gimp Nudes: If artfully done and done well I'd say that might rock.
Doing something gimpy: Again, it depends of how it is presented.
I like black and white photos, a bit moody and sensual. A black and white, thoughtful and sensual pose, maybe just shirt off would be a nice treat. I don't need to see the package or various orifices. I like to focus on the face.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fleur on Jun 28, 2007 22:43:23 GMT -5
The celeb photos suck and are actually pretty creepy. Zero appeal.
Gimp porn? (with partner) --- 4
Gimp nudes? (alone) --- 10
Dressed but doing something gimpy? (transfer, etc.) --- 9
Just wheeling? --- 7
|
|
|
|
Post by Fleur on Jun 28, 2007 22:51:01 GMT -5
I have actually never looked at them until you put up this post. Yuck. The photoshop quality is awful, but even if it were good, I have to say it does nothing for me whatsoever. I like real people. Gimp Porn: 4 on the scale. Doesn't entice my sensibilities. Gimp Nudes: If artfully done and done well I'd say that might rock. Doing something gimpy: Again, it depends of how it is presented. I like black and white photos, a bit moody and sensual. A black and white, thoughtful and sensual pose, maybe just shirt off would be a nice treat. I don't need to see the package or various orifices. I like to focus on the face. I don't think you're being honest with yourself, or at least not with the rest of the board. All of your answers were presented just as a non-devotee would have, making it seem like you're barely interested in wheeler guys at all. You diluted everything to the point that you actually seem blase about all the things that, essentially, turn a devotee on. Attempting to 'play it safe', I guess, so as to not offend or seem too.... weird |
|
|
|
Post by charlene on Jun 29, 2007 8:45:31 GMT -5
yeah the celeb pix really do suck... gimp porn: I enjoyed the porn link posted on here some time ago, but concerning porn I prefer some girl on girl action. gimp nudes: 7 doing something gimpy: 8 just wheeling: 6 But as I can have the last 4 almost every day, I prefer looking at my one and only wheeler  |
|
|
|
Post by dolly on Jun 29, 2007 9:36:52 GMT -5
i kind of get a kick out of the celebrity photos page. not because it's hot, but because it's so bizarre.  it's similar to what i do in my head quite often. i may see a wheeler dude somewhere...nice chair, nice body, but his face does nothing for me. so later i may fantasize about him but will change or improve his face. ha ha. i also employ this tactic in the event i like a movie but not the actor. if i'm replaying a favourite scene in my head...or developing a fantasy spinoff, i will simply swap heads. usually to a face i create... or perhaps resurrect from a memory. so i guess i understand what the appeal could be for some...if celebrity fantasies are your thing. it just doesn't do "it" for me. and yes, certain pictures can really get my imagination going. often the picture itself doesn't get me excited per se, rather it's how it may spark a fantasy scenario in my mind. (not always sexual) i didn't use the scale from 1 to 10 but my order of preference would be: 1. dressed but doing something gimpy (transfer, etc.) doesn't always have to be doing something particularly "gimpy", however.2. just wheeling 3. gimp nudes (alone) the b+w. moody and sensual pics that AB suggested would make this my #2. also i find the "body as a whole" more erotic than just seeing the "private" bits. ok...this might be a tie for 2nd place!4. gimp porn (with partner) if you have it, i'll look. lol but for me, this is at the bottom of the list |
|
|
|
Post by Enid on Jun 29, 2007 12:39:56 GMT -5
I have actually never looked at them until you put up this post. Yuck. The photoshop quality is awful, but even if it were good, I have to say it does nothing for me whatsoever. I like real people. Gimp Porn: 4 on the scale. Doesn't entice my sensibilities. Gimp Nudes: If artfully done and done well I'd say that might rock. Doing something gimpy: Again, it depends of how it is presented. I like black and white photos, a bit moody and sensual. A black and white, thoughtful and sensual pose, maybe just shirt off would be a nice treat. I don't need to see the package or various orifices. I like to focus on the face. I don't think you're being honest with yourself, or at least not with the rest of the board. All of your answers were presented just as a non-devotee would have, making it seem like you're barely interested in wheeler guys at all. You diluted everything to the point that you actually seem blase about all the things that, essentially, turn a devotee on. Attempting to 'play it safe', I guess, so as to not offend or seem too.... weirdNewsflash: devotees are people. There are people out there who don't like porn. There are even people out there who aren't interested in looking at pictures. Go figure! Being a devotee shouldn't be about how you "get your fix." I am honestly attracted to wheelers, but I generally do about it the same thing I do about the rest of the things I like. I watch movies only because I like one of the actors/actresses, and so I watch those with wheelers on them, and I love it. I read stories of characters/situations I'm interested in, and so I go out of my way to find those that include disabled people on them, but I also do so with other stuff I like. I don't like porn, and objectification is one of my biggest turn offs, so gimp porn is completely out of the question. I'm still scarred about some of the stuff I've seen in youtube *shudders* I like some "tasteful" erotic pictures, and yeah, I like them even better if they're of wheelers, but I don't look for them because there are too many that I simply don't like. I'm curious, if AB is "not being honest" does it mean that all those straight girls who aren't interested in porn should start checking if they're lesbians? That's almost as ridiculous as the lesbians who say that girls who don't like giving head are lesbians too (yes, I've heard this). I won't even go into the topic of guys who don't like porn, 'cause I'm sure you think they don't exist. |
|
|
|
Post by Pony on Jun 29, 2007 15:48:47 GMT -5
LOL...i know I don't belong here, but I'm with Charlene on the 'girl/girl' porn!! I don't even like most guy/girl porn, and I've had g/fs that liked girl/girl as much as me, and most had never been with another girl. As for celeb pics....CHEESY!! But Dolly has an AMAZING ability to mix n match...sheeeesh Dolly, you can just copy/paste LIFE!!  In future, please paste Johnny Depp's head on my body!!! The youtube clips of quads kind of urk me...i don't even like video clips of myself doing anything!! |
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 29, 2007 22:21:51 GMT -5
Yeah, I could use a 'pasteover' myself...put an Orlando Bloom on me, and we got ourselves a Pirates of the Chairibean thing going on!
Even though I've become well-learned of Devs, it still amazes me y'all like the normal everyday stuff we do...
I'm not much into home movies myself, lol, it's like listening to yourself on a tape recorder (or whatever people are using to record themselves these days), watching yourself on video is the same way...it kinda' makes ya' cringe (and I most definitely make people cringe).
|
|
|
|
Post by Valkyrja on Jun 29, 2007 23:51:13 GMT -5
I don't enjoy porn... no matter what kind of porn. I preferred erotic stories... but hard core porn with no story... PUAJ! so... Gimp porn: let me give it a 2 or 3.
Like AB, I enjoy gimp nudes wut the artistics... and, if the "artwork" is drawed in pencil... better!
The point of "doing something gimpy"... I must say that it depends on what the "gimpy thing" shows.
About the "celeb picture" section... they're really well done but, I really dislike the concept. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by dolly on Jun 30, 2007 0:14:54 GMT -5
with the celebrity photos i think what i find unsettling is the "jinx" factor, for lack of a better term. Yeah, I could use a 'pasteover' myself...put an Orlando Bloom on me, and we got ourselves a Pirates of the Chairibean thing going on! ha ha. ...sheeeesh Dolly, you can just copy/paste LIFE!! that would be fun, tony! but the head swapping only works in my imagination when i'm alone. i can't do it in real life. i'm realizing that everything i said in my previous post is also true in regard to AB men too. * being a dev probably doesn't really have anything to do with what we like or don't like in that regard. it's just that wheelers are the ones that i am most often looking at or thinking about. and there is less reference material available! * except the part about porn (with partner). AB porn (with partner) doesn't hold interest for me. |
|
|
|
Post by BA on Jun 30, 2007 7:29:53 GMT -5
I don't think you're being honest with yourself, or at least not with the rest of the board. All of your answers were presented just as a non-devotee would have, making it seem like you're barely interested in wheeler guys at all. You diluted everything to the point that you actually seem blase about all the things that, essentially, turn a devotee on. Attempting to 'play it safe', I guess, so as to not offend or seem too.... weirdOh Dear! I guess I am NOT a dev after all. I have been mistaken for all these years. Thank you Fleur for pointing this out to me. From now on I will have to condition myself to get wet upon sight of Orlando Bloom's head stuck on someone else's body! Crikey, that's going to take alot of work. Any suggestions as to how I can do this Fleur? Shock therapy perhaps? Charlene, how do I define my devness? Simply that I really, really, really enjoy looking at, being with, sleeping with and having sex with REAL guys who are attractive to me AND have a disability. Able bodied guys just don't get me that kind of hot. Nuff said? Nudie photos of any guy just don't turn me on. If he's nude in front of me, that's a different story. |
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 30, 2007 10:04:06 GMT -5
Sure you can...get a smiley face picture, then a paper bag. Apply paste to paper bag, then take smiley face and affix it to paper bag. Put paper bag over head of someone...result: new head!
Why must my post bethe one that always gets made an example of...whhhhhyyyy? ...and I really had that Pirate thing going on (actually I come from a family of famous Privateers too...reminds me of the Forrest Gump guy that was an amputee on the ship there lol)
|
|
|
|
Post by faith on Jun 30, 2007 13:48:22 GMT -5
I am not into porn at all, any type, gimp or not. The thought of watching two people just has never seemed right to me.
Nudes- maybe. It they are attractive and well done.
A wheeler dressed or just doing regular things- again maybe. Always fun to watch, but not always a sexual thing although sometimes it is.
The real thing is an entirely different story. That would rate highest on the list.
|
|
|
|
Post by Claire on Jul 2, 2007 10:09:13 GMT -5
I also found the celeb pix kind of creepy, and am with Dolly on the "jinx" factor. But, that said, there were one or two who I didn't recognize, had NO idea who they were, so they just looked like a regular guy to me, and found rather attractive if the photoshop job wasn't too bad. If you could ignore the faces, some of the bodies were nice indeed. gimp porn? (with partner) - nope, never blagh gimp nudes? (alone) - probably not, but maybe if tastefully done. Dunno, never seen any like that! dressed but doing something gimpy? (transfer, etc.) - yeah, I like that just wheeling? - like that too But I prefer video or real life! |
|
|
|
Post by devogirl on Jul 6, 2007 13:22:47 GMT -5
Just to defend poor Lee, in his absence, for posting those pics, it seems to be a pretty common thing on gay sites. There also used to be a number of gay devo sites that posted photos of gay porn with limbs photoshopped out or legbraces and such added in. And there are all those "your favorite movie star NUDE!" websites which are the same thing, only with better photoshopping. Personally, I dislike all of them, but whatever.
I'd rather watch the Paralympics than look at porn. Real life snapshots are a lot more attractive to me than nude photos.
|
|
it's similar to what i do in my head quite often. i may see a wheeler dude somewhere...nice chair, nice body, but his face does nothing for me. so later i may fantasize about him but will change or improve his face. ha ha. i also employ this tactic in the event i like a movie but not the actor. if i'm replaying a favourite scene in my head...or developing a fantasy spinoff, i will simply swap heads. usually to a face i create... or perhaps resurrect from a memory. so i guess i understand what the appeal could be for some...if celebrity fantasies are your thing. it just doesn't do "it" for me.
In future, please paste Johnny Depp's head on my body!!! 
