|
|
Post by E on Jan 5, 2006 9:51:03 GMT -5
Oh man, the colors will only get brighter after the scabbing stops. They'll be a lot more vivid in a week or so. The ones I got last night took a total of about two and a half hours because of the detail. (You can't really see too much of it because the camera's so far away). But yes, Creative-E, I will tattoo a HUGE Paradevo across your back for you. It shall be done. Tattoo your soul burn the bowl diamonds squeezed from coal pressure takes its toll ... um, sorry. Just ignore that. Random spots of inspiration. In any case, when I was in Hawaii, I wanted to add to the ink I have now, but time was an issue. And then I decided I need to take a vacation to Tahiti just to get worked on. They have some great manual artists there. |
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jan 7, 2006 19:30:22 GMT -5
Chan, how many tattoos do you have?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chan on Jan 9, 2006 14:43:59 GMT -5
Right now, just the trashcans and cat skulls on my shoulders. Next comes a disgustingly happy unicorn dancing across a rainbow with sparkles, froo-froo, etc. The words "Sparkle Time" will be in bold, black letters over the rainbow. This will go somewhere along my hip/sides. I'm holding off on the sassy, red octopus on my right calf, though. I plan on working in a snazzy place one day. I'll most likely wear skirts (hence the snazziness) so I dont want to scare off any potential employers.
Though my current tats might seem a bit eye-catching, they're actually easily concealed with a short-sleeved shirt. Grandma will never know....
|
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jan 11, 2006 0:47:34 GMT -5
No plans for the "traditional" places--ankle and the lower back?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chan on Jan 11, 2006 1:38:39 GMT -5
Ha, I'm not much of a "traditional" girl.
I have, however, considered getting fish bones on my lower back. I think those would be neat-o.
|
|
|
|
Post by V on Jan 11, 2006 4:50:09 GMT -5
I've been thinking about getting some ink. Either a Mandelbrot or Sierpinski's Seive, I think. That said, my complete ignorance on how to find a good artist has kept me from doing it yet, as has my indecision on its placement. Sigh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jan 11, 2006 9:34:48 GMT -5
The Mandelbrot Set, huh? But the tattooist would have to use smaller and smaller needles. And it would take...forever!
|
|
|
|
Post by E on Jan 11, 2006 9:54:45 GMT -5
I found this totally interesting (but I'm such a dork). It's different alterations to the typical Mandelbrot set by changing a component in the formula. The best part is when he starts going between integers. I'm sure you'll like it, V. homepage.ntlworld.com/sandam.morley/home.htm |
|
|
|
Post by Pisti on Jan 11, 2006 13:19:56 GMT -5
I found this totally interesting (but I'm such a dork). It IS interesting! Thanks for the link! |
|
|
|
Post by E on Jan 11, 2006 21:53:41 GMT -5
I found this totally interesting (but I'm such a dork). It IS interesting! Thanks for the link! Aw. My plesha. |
|
|
|
Post by V on Jan 12, 2006 3:36:02 GMT -5
By definition, it will indeed take forever.  Awesome link, Eric. That's really cool. I <3 fractals. |
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jan 12, 2006 16:53:45 GMT -5
Here's a question for you Maths people: Could you have a 3D Mandelbrot-like set(Whoa! Duuuude! ? What would the iterated function(s) equations be like for that? |
|
|
|
Post by dolly on Jan 12, 2006 19:36:17 GMT -5
just wanted to say.... i have no idea what you people are talking about!!!! i clicked on eric's link and it made my head hurt.  |
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jan 16, 2006 10:01:34 GMT -5
Hmm..,.this gives me an idea; maybe instead of thick lines on my torso, I'll just get an arrangement of thin lines, like that drawing.
That'd have to be cheaper and quicker, right Chan?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chan on Jan 16, 2006 14:49:45 GMT -5
Indeed.
|
|
Awesome link, Eric. That's really cool.
