Banned because paras + devo's are ok

[maladjusted]

This, or similar was posted on femalefirst.co.uk in their ‘better sex’ forum. The first sentence below is the thread title.

Are Paraplegics the best relationship?

As the title says… (Paraplegics, you know the ones with muscled arms and have broken their back being active.)


Anyway came across this link as I was surfing the net, as you do. Looking further into the posts these girls say they are the best and are very happy with their boys!

gave link to paradevo site here

Is there something I have missed, is there something mom didn’t tell me, is there something you know that I don’t?

This was my first post on this site, in the sex category. Some of the stuff they are posting is ‘out there’ and encouraged (for example they will happily ask if they have had sex with animals). Within a very short time my post was deleted and I was banned? No explanation, no mail, no comment!!!

May I point out, although brand new to me, I think paraplegic devo’s are absolutely fantastic . Wish I new about the girls way back when, I would have been asking so many questions about paraplegia and their advice etc etc etc…

Anyway, back to the matter in hand, or to be precise discrimination.

If I was ‘of colour’ and I had showed a site of people that preferred a relationship with a ‘person of colour’, would I have been banned, would the thread be erased?

What was it that caused such a great offence, disabled boys with able bodied girls?

Is it such a shock that disabled boys might offer a more fulfilling relationship to the partner, than an able bodied person?

Is it so hard for femalefirst to get its head around disabled people being attractive?

Dose the person who banned me have such a deep routed problem with disability?

Does it feel that the disabled should be seen and not heard???

I am banned from the site and cannot defend myself or the para devo’s. Was hoping, somebody would make a (femalefirst.co.uk) forum topic link to this (paradevo.com) thread. So they have an opportunity to make a reasonable justification of their actions, here on this site.

This is honest, we want from them is a justification for banning me and my thread!!!

Thanks xxx

[needles]

I really highly doubt they would...just one of those things where people run from what they dont understand or mayhaps when certain things are too close to coming out in the wash...

[maladjusted]

needles said:

I really highly doubt they would...just one of those things where people run from what they dont understand or mayhaps when certain things are too close to coming out in the wash...

The person who banned me is not important. What is important is the views (within reason) of the users of the message board. I would link to them, but can not as banned. Would one of you make a link for me...

[needles]

maladjusted said:

This, or similar was posted on femalefirst.co.uk in their ‘better sex’ forum. The first sentence below is the thread title.

Is it so hard for femalefirst to get its head around disabled people being attractive?

Dose the person who banned me have such a deep routed problem with disability?

Does it feel that the disabled should be seen and not heard???

This is honest, we want from them is a justification for banning me and my thread!!!

Thanks xxx

They aren't? I didn' say they were important or not i just said i doubt they'd justify themselves.

[maladjusted]

Still would appreciate a link from there to here (as i said i can't as my Addy is banned). Would anybody make a topic over there in 'better sex' and a link to this paradevo thread? would be in your debt.

[needles]

make a new email just for the purpose of that board.

[andyc251]

im guessing that the link was deleted, and you were banned because it was classed as linking to a site with pornography.

[wheelie37]

I visited the site, and you have to register and get a password etc.

[wheelie37]

just managed to post as a guest in a different forrum here is the link www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=680791#680791

[wheelie37]

I would suggest starting a new thread in a forum where you can add things as a guest, and starting a new thread on a subject of your choice, as a guest

[maladjusted]

What ‘gets my goat’ is, whoever banned me would never have the guts, to ban me ‘face to face’ over an issue of disability and relationships.

[wheelie37]

Well I have a saying "what goes around comes around".
One thing is certain in life, we all get old.
One day the person concerned WILL be disabled in some way and I hope they remember their attitudes to disabled people in the past!

[maladjusted]

The on going sarga or story so far…

Got myself banned from femalefirst for implying that there are girls that prefer a decent para. Mentioned this site as an example, especially if you look further into the posts/threads and the girls are there.

(By the way despite the ‘devo’ lable you girls are being open and honest about you feelings. Most girls, in my average experance, once they have entertained the idea of romance with a sci there is no substitute.)

So I reposted on femalefirst a new thread from a different email address, asking questions why banned etc..? In the post I referenced this current paradevo thread, inviting comment on paras and devo's? So for the second time I’ve got myself banned and a second thread removed.

(Again by the way, 95% of the rational (If single) girls i have spoken to either have had a relationship with a sci, or would have a relationship. All, single or not, think there is nothing wrong with paradevo or my post)

Guess I will put it down to someone with ‘moderator ego’, hmmmm maybe I’ll do another post…

[wheelie37]

good luck!

[maladjusted]

....so the thread continues!

www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=68204

Wonder how long befor my post is removed and I am banned x