|
Post by BA on Jun 2, 2007 17:56:58 GMT -5
...Biggest turn-off in the whole world (to me) is NO BRAIN. I need a globally intelligent man. Big Johnson, not so important ... big brain, imperative. Twenty years ago, I would have sung a different tune, but life is strange that way.
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jun 2, 2007 18:20:35 GMT -5
I dunno...as someone who is BOTH markedly smarter than average and markedly ah, 'bigger' than average as well; I have to say the Big Johnson aspect is pretty darn important to me. Or it was when I was younger, anyway.
I'd certainly choose more Down There than more IQ points, as it were...
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jun 2, 2007 23:47:25 GMT -5
I'd certainly choose more Down There than more IQ points, as it were... You've said that before, but I still don't get it. How exactly would a larger dick help you get chicks you can't get now? Not only would I take more smarts over more size, I'd actually trade away some size for more smarts (or maybe more ambition, or less laziness).
|
|
|
Post by E on Jun 3, 2007 1:20:51 GMT -5
I'd certainly choose more Down There than more IQ points, as it were... You've said that before, but I still don't get it. How exactly would a larger dick help you get chicks you can't get now? Roger that. If she gets to the point to find out you aren't that large, don't you already have her?
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jun 3, 2007 4:02:14 GMT -5
Did I say that before? Heh. Sorry. Actually it's not about 'getting chicks' per se...I'd say that being on the large side is a good thing just in itself. It gives you a certain self-confidence.
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 3, 2007 7:59:21 GMT -5
...well theoretically you are somewhat partially correct when you say bigger may give you more confidence...bigger usually means more testosterone... ...unfortunately... ...scientific studies (recent) have shown, that for a short term...'Oh baby I want you now' moment, women will indeed prefer a more masculine, 'foot-long sausage'...sure, makes for a good wild time... ...but for long-term relationship they look for qualities similar to themselves (more feminine)...and I thought I was doomed... Tri- well equiped in both depts.? Can you multi-task though? I want to see 4D Calculus and Quantum Theory...while pleasing a woman...
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jun 3, 2007 9:27:44 GMT -5
Well now, I just said I was 'above average'...
I've still a ways to go from being a Genius and in the true Big Leagues.
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 3, 2007 13:44:36 GMT -5
Yeah, I know, just hasslin' ya'...but no one is more multitascular than an I.T. Professional.
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jun 3, 2007 15:40:04 GMT -5
I'd say that being on the large side is a good thing just in itself. It gives you a certain self-confidence. Ok, but what does the confidence get you? I'm just not getting it. Unless a guy has a really small dick, it seems to me choosing more smarts is going to make you much better off overall, including with women.
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jun 3, 2007 17:04:38 GMT -5
Well, if you had a small dick, you'd just have to think of it as a fine tuned, precision made, carefully calibrated instrument of pleasure, which requires the talents of a skilled operator.
All I'm saying Matisse is that a plus/minus IQ 120 is good enough in this life, in my experience. When I was younger I used to be impressed by genius, and jealous of it. But raw intellect is not everyrthing...
IMO, overall, a man would get more fun, pleasure and satisfaction from a large unit. But...it's not EVERYTHING, of course.
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jun 3, 2007 17:39:31 GMT -5
But now you are lucky enough not to have to worry about money or working, right? When you have to work, every little bit of extra intelligence makes a big difference, both in advancement and in your ability to do things quickly in order to allow you more free time.
When you no longer were impressed by smarter people, did that coincide with you not working anymore?
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 3, 2007 21:01:34 GMT -5
You seem to argue against your point with the 'fine tuned...' statement...I geuss it's a matter of glass half-empty, half-full...some would be able to be confident with the above...others would want something that can't be topped ODing on Viagra.
Oh yeah, matisse, 666 posts man...scary.
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jun 4, 2007 2:18:08 GMT -5
Well, that is a good point, Matisse. Remember, I'm not saying intelligence is NOT important...just that being super smart may be over-rated somewhat, and not really so necessary in order to enjoy yourself and be beneficial to the world. I'd rather be more naturally kind and compassionate than a lot smarter than I am, for instance...
But yeah, I'll concede that being a genius probably does help in being well remunerated financially(see I'm shmart enough to know the BIG WORDS). But ambition, drive, vision, follow through, social ease, and hard work-all qualities I tend to be weak in-are probably more crucial.
Still, yeah, it would be kinda fun to be an absent-minded academic bumbling around an arcadian campus getting paid $70,000 per year to dream about string theory, while setting beautiful grad assistants hearts pounding because of your mighty brain...
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 4, 2007 8:29:49 GMT -5
Some Academic researching String Theory would be getting more than 70,000 a year...that would maybe be their first quarter spending money for a small university. Moderation is key in my book, in whatever scale it may be in...sort of like the "Renaissance Men", having too much of one or the other can cause problems...just look at Homer Simpson when they took the crayon out of his nose.
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Jun 4, 2007 12:33:05 GMT -5
Being a tenured prof at the right U is indeed a cush gig...but do they clear 280K??
|
|