|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 2, 2008 14:48:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by charlene on Jun 3, 2008 0:13:05 GMT -5
Did you read the comments?
Pretty cruel...
|
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 3, 2008 0:19:40 GMT -5
Yeah, the comments may be harsh and ignorant for many people's tastes, but the article itself is what I focused on.
|
|
|
|
Post by charlene on Jun 3, 2008 0:25:01 GMT -5
Yep, wind, me too. But nevertheless, I was pretty "surprised"...  |
|
|
|
Post by E on Jun 3, 2008 9:34:43 GMT -5
C'mon, though, this was pretty funny...
"I think that news deserves a standing ovation!"
|
|
|
|
Post by charlene on Jun 3, 2008 13:00:44 GMT -5
I see the offensive comments where removed, but one said "I would f cuk her" and you guys are worrying about not being seen as sexual human beings?  |
|
|
|
Post by Ouch on Jun 3, 2008 23:46:26 GMT -5
I see the offensive comments where removed, but one said "I would f cuk her" and you guys are worrying about not being seen as sexual human beings? Well that's the other side of the mirror, one could say - Those evil male devs are more ravenous than the female variety most of the time. |
|
Phil
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by Phil on Jun 9, 2008 15:52:13 GMT -5
That's a pretty cool adaption. She needs to lose that 60's housefrau dress and dress like a rocker, though. No way can she pull off (pun intended) a Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction when dressed like Aunt Bea from Mayberry.  |
|
