|
|
Post by rebecca on Oct 2, 2006 19:26:05 GMT -5
I'm not even going back to the 'Brown Banana' thread.
Patelville, you should at least give a warning that what you've posted is NC-17.
Ugh.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2006 19:39:23 GMT -5
I think he was away for the whole junk or no junk thread. ROFL
|
|
|
|
Post by meinkaltestesherz on Oct 2, 2006 20:34:40 GMT -5
i got that in a yahoo im. *sigh*
|
|
|
|
Post by E on Oct 2, 2006 21:40:14 GMT -5
I had this funny feeling... when he kept asking how to post pictures... Um, yeah.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Oct 2, 2006 22:19:51 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHA HA! But you gotta admit...it IS a pretty nice dick. No, come on. It is.  |
|
|
|
Post by rebecca on Oct 3, 2006 5:07:48 GMT -5
It doesn't matter if everyone is above the age of consent.
And I just sent an IM to the moderator.
Please change the title of your post or remove the picture.
And trust me, Triassic, I'm not so desperate for a look at someone's schlong that I stuck around and admired it.
|
|
|
|
Post by E on Oct 3, 2006 6:57:49 GMT -5
I just had this little chuckle to myself when I realized he posted it in a folder called "Personals," which could almost be translated to "Privates." Oh, I crack myself up...
|
|
|
|
Post by Enid on Oct 3, 2006 7:01:26 GMT -5
....stop the attention cravings I find that extremely rich coming from somebody who just posted what you just did. What was that for, then? Also, this post might look to you like attention craving, but it saved me from opening the other one. I could care less if you want post NC-17 pics, but I don't think a warning is asking that much, most people would think it's common sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Royter on Oct 3, 2006 7:09:49 GMT -5
yep well said Enid a warning would be appreciated
|
|
|
|
Post by leanne on Oct 3, 2006 7:11:42 GMT -5
I think Patelville is the one seeking attention.. now how do we know if its really his dick??
|
|
|
|
Post by Triassic on Oct 3, 2006 9:03:42 GMT -5
Yep...women are totally grossed out by pictures of cock.
|
|
mcc2121
Junior Member
Posts: 67
Relationship Status: Single
|
Post by mcc2121 on Oct 3, 2006 9:43:24 GMT -5
Patel, I've noticed the common theme in your posts is you being frustrated in your attempts to meet women, and how your disability may play a part in that.
Ever think the reason it doesn't work out has more to do with your approach and less to do with your disability? Just a thought.
BTW, since you unexpectedly took us all to the produce section, exactly how many women have messaged you?
|
|
mcc2121
Junior Member
Posts: 67
Relationship Status: Single
|
Post by mcc2121 on Oct 3, 2006 10:45:39 GMT -5
mc i dont understan your beef with me, why dont you mind your own business and i will do that... bcos i dont know u and u dont know me...so just enjoy the chat without getting into all thi s politics Patel, you want to know my "beef" with you? Each and every day I get up I do my damndest to dispell stereotypes associated with disabled guys. Whether it's because people treat us like we're naive, innocent or just plain dumb, I have to work extra hard (socially and in business) to overcome those misguided beliefs. And then you come along... Not only do you reinforce the stereotype that disabled men know little about talking to the opposite sex, you (a fellow disabled guy) attempted to emasculate your brothers with crap like "jealous you can't get a hard on". My problem is that knowing you're out there, I'm gonna have to work twice as hard to create a better vision of what disabled are truly like. |
|
|
|
Post by Cake on Oct 3, 2006 14:52:54 GMT -5
What for?? in case you haven't noticed, no-one's really interested. yeah, now at least you got some attention, but it's obviously a negative one. mcc is absolutely right: think about the question if maybe your attitude could be a problem with women.
oh and your complain that there were no replies to your masturbation-thread: that's exactly the problem. all your posts are sorts of sexual approaches. we've never seen anything else of you. and although we talk about our sexuality on this board, most of us are definitely not here to do some dirty talk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pony on Oct 3, 2006 15:52:35 GMT -5
mc i dont understan your beef with me, why dont you mind your own business and i will do that... bcos i dont know u and u dont know me...so just enjoy the chat without getting into all thi s politics Patel, you want to know my "beef" with you? Each and every day I get up I do my damndest to dispell stereotypes associated with disabled guys. Whether it's because people treat us like we're naive, innocent or just plain dumb, I have to work extra hard (socially and in business) to overcome those misguided beliefs. And then you come along... Not only do you reinforce the stereotype that disabled men know little about talking to the opposite sex, you (a fellow disabled guy) attempted to emasculate your brothers with crap like "jealous you can't get a hard on". My problem is that knowing you're out there, I'm gonna have to work twice as hard to create a better vision of what disabled are truly like. i missed the "emasculating" comment, and i see Patel apologized for it, but it's the kinda thang that maybe has steered a lot of devs towards dudes in chairs. I mean most AB dudes are obsessed with their cocks, using it, showing it, and it's really a turn off to 99% chicks. The other 1% are chicks with dicks. In my case, my junk hasn't worked since accident, but "emasculated" i'm not. There's incredible ways to please chicks without the "junk", and i think devs probably understand that better than most chicks. Actually, i've had three married chicks in my quad time, and all three said that sex was a lot more pleasing (orgasm) than with their functioning cock husbands. It's the dude, not the cock, or lack of... |
|
